 |
| Find dockets from Federal trial courts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Election 2008
Will There Be A Hollywood Ending To The Dramatic Story Of Clinton Vs. Obama?
by JOHN W. DEAN
Presidential Candidates vs. Hate
Why Obama And McCain Should Repudiate The Messages Of Their Extremist Religious Endorsers
by MARCI HAMILTON
|
|
|
| Real-Time SEC Edgar Filings |
| Enter all or part of the company's name or ticker symbol. You can also search for companies grouped by Standard Industrial Classification codes: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| US Supreme Court |
|
- YEAGER v. UNITED STATES [08-67]
- WONG v. BELMONTES [08-1263]
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas Corpus, Sentencing
In capital habeas proceedings, a circuit court's order requiring the petition to be granted is reversed where petitioner did not establish that defense counsel prejudiced petitioner by providing him ineffective assistance at the penalty phase of his trial, because petitioner failed to show a reasonable probability that the jury would have rejected a capital sentence after it weighed the entire body of mitigating evidence against the entire body of aggravating evidence. - SAFFORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. #1 v. REDDING [08-479]
|
|
| US Court of Appeals - Ninth Circuit |
|
- DELANO FARMS COMPANY v. CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE COMMISS [11/20]
Agriculture, Constitutional Law, Food & Beverages, Government Law
In a First Amendment challenge to a state statutory scheme requiring grape growers to fund generic advertising, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where the state agricultural commission's promotional activities constituted government speech that was immune to challenge under the First Amendment. - ELLEN LEVINE v. EDWARD T. SCHAFER [11/20]
Administrative Law, Agriculture, Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law
In an action challenging the USDA's enunciation of its position in the Federal Register that there was no specific federal humane handling and slaughter statute for poultry, plaintiffs' appeal is remanded with instructions to dismiss the matter where plaintiffs could not satisfy the redressability requirement for Article III standing because the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act contained no statutory enforcement mechanism. - JOSEPH PADGETT v. BRIAN LOVENTHAL [11/20]
|
|
*PDF Format |
|
|
|
|
|
